独立性承诺
蒋的实验室 Jiang's Lab 是一个独立运营的评测站点,结论只对读者负责。我们不接受付费好评、不接受删稿要求、不为任何品牌预设结论。如果一篇文章里出现了某个品牌的名字,那只可能是因为它确实在测试结果里值得出现——而不是因为有人付了钱。
编辑与商务完全分开:负责评测的人不碰广告报价,负责广告的人不碰评测结论。这条线我们划得很死。
我们如何选题
选题来自三处:读者来信里反复出现的问题、我们自己在购机时踩过的坑、以及同价位里争议最大的产品。我们优先测「大多数人会买」的型号,而不是厂商最想让我们吹的旗舰。
- 优先考虑已被大量用户实际购买的主流型号;
- 同一篇文章尽量保持同平台、同版本、同环境对比;
- 不追热点凑数,没有结论就不发稿。
我们如何测试
所有硬件评测都遵循「同平台、同环境、可复现」三项原则:
- 同平台:参与对比的产品运行在同一套测试主机、同一 BIOS / 驱动版本下;
- 同环境:温度、室温、采样方式保持一致,并记录测试条件;
- 可复现:关键数据保留原始日志,欢迎读者在相同条件下复现并质疑。
外设与音频设备采用长期使用而非开箱即测:显示器看满两周的色彩与拖影、键盘敲满一个月的手感、降噪耳机用满通勤周期才下结论。我们不采信厂商宣传样张,凡样张一律自己拍。
样品与厂商关系
测试样品可能有三种来源:自购、厂商送测、或借测。无论哪种来源,样品的提供都不构成对评测结论的任何承诺或限制。我们会在文章的利益披露段落说明样品来源;无法说明来源的,默认按自购处理。
厂商可以就技术参数提出澄清,但无权审阅或批准最终文章。任何经厂商反馈修正的内容,我们会在文末更正记录中标注。
利益披露
如果站点包含联盟营销链接或接受过赞助,我们会在每篇相关文章的显著位置声明,绝不隐瞒。隐瞒利益关系既违反 FTC 指南,也违反 Google 的政策,我们的立场是「宁可少赚,不可不报」。
错误更正流程
人都会错,错就认。当读者指出具体错误且经我们核实后:
- 在文章正文对应位置修正,并在文末「更正记录」注明修改日期与原因;
- 数据类错误优先更正,并保留原始数据截图以便复核;
- 重大结论性错误若无法在不误导的前提下修正,我们会撤稿而非强行修补。
站长
本站由 jiangliqi 一人独立运营,每篇文章均署名到具体作者:
jiangliqi · 站长 / 作者
负责全部选题、评测与审稿,覆盖 CPU、主板、装机配置、手机、外设与音频。坚持「以自己跑出的数据为准」,所有评测样品均为自购。
版权与署名
本站原创文章的著作权归作者与站点所有,转载请保留署名与原文链接并注明出处。引用本站数据请标注来源与日期,避免断章取义。商业授权转载请联系 。
联系编辑部
Our independence commitment
Jiang's Lab is an independent review site, and our conclusions answer only to readers. We do not accept paid positive reviews, do not accept takedown requests, and never preset a verdict for any brand. If a brand name appears in an article, it is only because it genuinely earned its place in the results — not because someone paid for it.
Editorial and commercial interests are fully separated: the people who write reviews never touch ad pricing, and the people who sell ads never touch review conclusions. We keep that line hard.
How we choose topics
Topics come from three places: questions readers keep asking, traps we have hit ourselves while buying gear, and the most contested products at a given price. We prioritise models most people will actually buy over the flagships vendors most want us to praise.
- Mainstream models that real users have bought in volume come first;
- Comparisons in one article stay on one platform, one firmware, one environment;
- No hype for its own sake — if there is no conclusion, there is no article.
How we test
Every hardware review follows three rules: same bench, same environment, reproducible.
- Same bench: compared products run on one identical test rig, same BIOS / driver version;
- Same environment: temperature, room conditions and sampling are held constant and recorded;
- Reproducible: key numbers keep raw logs, and readers are welcome to reproduce and challenge them under the same conditions.
Peripherals and audio are judged after long-term use, not out-of-box: monitor colour and smearing after two weeks, keyboard feel after a month, ANC headphones across a full commute cycle. We never rely on manufacturer sample shots — when a sample image is needed, we shoot it ourselves.
Samples & manufacturer relationships
Review samples may come from three sources: self-purchase, vendor supply, or loan. Whatever the source, supplying a sample buys no promise about the verdict and places no restriction on what we publish. We declare the sample source in each article's disclosure paragraph; anything we cannot trace defaults to self-purchased.
A vendor may clarify technical specs, but has no right to review or approve the final article. Any change prompted by vendor feedback is logged in the article's correction note.
Disclosure
If the site carries affiliate links or sponsored content, we state it prominently on every relevant article — never hidden. Concealing interests breaks both FTC guidance and Google's policies; our stance is "earn less rather than disclose nothing".
How we correct mistakes
People make mistakes, and we own ours. When a reader flags a specific error and we verify it:
- We fix it in the article and note the date and reason in the "Corrections" section at the end;
- Data errors are corrected first, with the original screenshot kept for review;
- If a conclusion-level error cannot be fixed without misleading, we retract the article rather than patch it.
The person
This site is run by one person, jiangliqi, and every article is signed to its author:
jiangliqi · Founder / Author
Handles every review, edit and final read across CPUs, motherboards, build planning, phones, peripherals and audio. Stands by "numbers I ran myself" — and every sample so far has been bought with my own money.
Authorship & copyright
Original articles here are owned by their authors and the site. Republishing must keep the byline, the original link and the source. When quoting our data, cite the source and date, and avoid taking it out of context. For licensed republication, contact .
Contact the editors
For corrections, challenges to a verdict, or sample offers: . For privacy and data questions, see the Privacy Policy; for advertising, see Contact Us.